Coarticulatory stability in american English /r/
نویسندگان
چکیده
A number of different researchers have reported a substantial degree of variability in how American English /r/ coarticulates with neighboring segments. Acoustic and articulatory data were used to investigate this variability for speakers of "rhotic" American English dialects. Three issues were addressed: (1) the degree to which the F3 trajectory is affected by segmental context and stress, (2) to what extent the data support a "coproduction" versus a "spreading" model of coarticulation, and (3) the degree to which the major acoustic manifestation of American English /r/--the time course of F3--reflects tongue movement for /r/. The f3 formant trajectory durations were measured by automatic procedure and compared for nonsense words of the form /'waCrav/ and /wa'Crav/, where C indicates a labial, alveolar, or velar consonant. These durations were compared to F3 trajectory durations in /'warav/ and /wa'rav/. In addition, formant values in initial syllables of words with and without /r/ were examined for effects of intervening consonant contexts. Results indicated similar F3 trajectory durations across the different consonant contexts, and to a lesser degree across stress, suggesting that coarticulation of /r/ can be achieved by overlap of a stable /r/-related articulatory trajectory with movements for neighboring sounds. This interpretation, and the concordance of F3 time course with tongue movement for /r/, was supported by direct measures of tongue movement for one subject.
منابع مشابه
Perception of coarticulatory nasalization by speakers of English and Thai: evidence for partial compensation.
The conditions under which listeners do and do not compensate for coarticulatory vowel nasalization were examined through a series of experiments of listeners' perception of naturally produced American English oral and nasal vowels spliced into three contexts: oral (C_C), nasal (N_N), and isolation. Two perceptual paradigms, a rating task in which listeners judged the relative nasality of stimu...
متن کاملLong-range liquid coarticulation in American English: a preliminary study
The sounds [r] and [l] are unique in the sense that in a word containing that sound, vowels for several syllables before and after the [r]/ [l] will be slightly [r]or [l]-like themselves. The effect of different sounds on vowels can be measured by analyzing the specific formants, or acoustic components of vowel sounds. Previous studies have found that in British English dialects, the liquid sou...
متن کاملCross-language Study of the Perception of Coarticulated Speech
Perception of coarticulated speech has been shown to be compensatory in that some of the acoustic characteristics of a target sound are attributed to coarticulatory context rather than to the target itself. But is perceptual compensation sensitive to language-specific coarticulatory patterns? This question was addressed through cross-language acoustic and perceptual study of two types of coarti...
متن کاملThe time course of perception of coarticulation.
The perception of coarticulated speech as it unfolds over time was investigated by monitoring eye movements of participants as they listened to words with oral vowels or with late or early onset of anticipatory vowel nasalization. When listeners heard [CṼNC] and had visual choices of images of CVNC (e.g., send) and CVC (said) words, they fixated more quickly and more often on the CVNC image whe...
متن کاملCoarticulatory stability in American English /./
A number of different researchers have reported a substantial degree of variability in how American English /./ coarticulates with neighboring segments. Acoustic and articulatory data were used to investigate this variability for speakers of ‘‘rhotic’’ American English dialects. Three issues were addressed: ~1! the degree to which the F3 trajectory is affected by segmental context and stress, ~...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
دوره 101 6 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1996